"Young Writer Searches for Harlem" by Dwight Garner | Published 1/25/11 | A Book Review Analysis

           In “Young Writer Searches for Harlem,” Garner weaves together a skillful essay using many rhetorical devices to analyze Harlem is Nowhere by Sharifa Rhodes-Pitts.

           These rhetorical devices include diction, such as alliteration and specific diction choices. For example, Garner uses alliteration when he writes, "Watch the walking". Furthermore, Garner skillfully uses specific diction choices to better his writing. A specific diction choice that really struck me is when he says, "some of the sentences wheeze." That is not only an example of personification created through a single diction choice, but it also creates great imagery of sentences not being able to live up to readers' standards.

             In addition, Garner uses a lot of imagery in this essay, such as when he says, "sound, one you cock your head at an angle to hear," and "you climb inside her skull." This all helps the reader better understand the book because it allows us to understand that the book is not only intriguing and intimate, but it also gives us this information by creating a mental image in the reader's head, allowing such information to stick.

              Furthermore, Garner uses great syntax in his essay, such as when he says, "But that vanaishes as the book moves forward, and charting the sensorium of Harlem's ghosts becomes her primary occupation." The consistent use of passive voice, "the book moves forward," "...becomes her primary occupation", suggests that the book progressed almost without the author's will. Overall, Garner's use of rhetorical devices in his essay makes it flow easily and helps him convey his point in an easy-to-understand manner.

          The only weakness I see in Garner's essay is that its language is kind of bland. The sentence structures are not very varied and it doesn't include a lot of interesting vocab or intresting introduction/conclusion to capture and intrigue the reader.

            In analyzing Young Writer Searches for Harlem, Garner mostly uses psychoanalytic criticism. In his book review, Garner analyzed Harlem is Nowhere mostly from the author, Sharifa Rhodes-Pitts' perspective. He emphasizes the effect of the author being from Texas and having attended Harvard's effect on her life, and thus her book. It also explains how her other experiences, being the only black student in her high school English class, and the other literary works that she has researched has affected her take on Harlem, and thus her novel. The book review is mostly about how the book is simply a manifestation of Rhodes-Pitts' subconcious take on Harlem. Garner also uses formalist criticism when he criticizes Rhodes-Pitts' writing style.

            Timberg's description of Harlem is Nowhere really reminds me of A Raisin in the Sun. In both books, the author took the title from another Harlem author's work. Moreover, both books are about reaching for the American dream amist the culture and neighborhood and oppressions of Harlem.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/books/26book.html?ref=books

Core Concept #3: 12/13/10-1/7/11

Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead

The Play

• We all become a part of the performance because we willingly suspend belief
• Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead" "breaks the 4th wall" between actors and the audience
• The play breaks into our comfort zone
• It is meant to be a part of Hamlet (layered over Hamlet)
• Rosencrantz and Guildenstern have vastly different personalities, yet Stoppard insists on confusing them
• Famous quote: "Life in a box is better than no life at all"
• Although Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead is supposed to be the missing layer of Hamlet, the universe is vastly different, and many tricks are played

Delving Deeper

• The play is one of the Theater of the Absurd and asks existential questions
• The play is an allegory: Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are us; the box, boat, play are the container/vehicle of life: it has the illusion of boundlessness, but it is in fact written for us: it's all an illusion; the playwrite is fate/god
• Hamlet is a paradoxical character, he is the most important/powerful person in Denmark, but he is stuck in a web not of his design and in the end, he resigns himself to the providencial God
• Is a life in a box (life) really better than no life at all?
• Stoppard turns Hamlet's messages inside out

Being Born

• A character is born when the playwright commands it, people are born when God/fate commands it
• In the beginning Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are in a dark bar, and then they are summoned into the light (they are born)
• Rosencrantz & Guildenstern can't remember anything after that: when they're on the horse, they mention that they can't remember how they got there
• "There must've been a time in the beginning when we could've said no". This quote is ironic because it is a life. In the beginning, we had no choice but to be born.

Lecture on Stoppard

• Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead is a highly derivative play
• The play belongs to the Theater of the Absurd, thus the play does not have the "horizon of significance" of other plays, the protagonists' attempts to deal with their world is often absurd, its heroes lacks what it takes to act confidently in the world, the protagonists are often waiting for something to happen, there is bleak humor, and the language is unpredictable, unreliable and deceiving
• This reminds me of British Literature, when we read The Tempest by William Shakespare. In the play, Caliban, Trinculo, and Stephano decide to take over the island, but the world is absurd to them because they don't understand the traditions of the upper class that surrounds them, nor do they understand that their every move is being guided by Prospero through magic (much like a playwright guides his characters), and they often get distracted from their goal (much like how Rosencrantz and Guildenstern get distracted from their goal of getting information out of Hamlet)
• Stoppard builds a lot of the absurdness of the play with rhetorical devices (using many of the devices that we've learned of before: such as repetition, irony, diction, syntax, parallelism...)
• There is a unique element of friendship in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, giving each of the main characters more of a specific identity
• Art is at odds with the world of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern because art confers order

Death of a Salesman

• Death of a Salesman is a play. Form follows function and Miller must've chosen to write Death of a Salesman as a play for all that a play can offer, and despite all the limits of plays
• We learned about the good parts about plays previous: it's powerful, and it gives the audience the sense of a communal experience that heightens meaning
• Limits of plays are that it has to be able to hold the attention of the audience and it requires artificiality,
• Linda is like a mother to Willy because Willy is a man who never grew up
• Evidence: his name is Willy (not William, not Bill, but Willy), he says "gee", a lot of people call him "kid", Biff calls him a "prince", not a "king"
• Linda keeps on trying to feed Willy dairy products, like breastfeeding
• Linda does not respect Willy, if she did, she would treat him like an equal and call him out on his lies
• Thus, Biff and Happy have to compete with Willy to win the affection of their mother
• Did Ben really make his fortune in African diamonds, or is he a shadier character?
• In Death of a Salesman, the women are either "mothers" or "whores". This is actually a motif in Western literature
• Well-liked v. Loved
• Willy wanted to be well-liked, but he didn't realized that he was loved and that was what mattered
• This idea of well-liked v. loved is very relevant even today because people want to be liked, and sometimes, in that quest to impress people and to get others to like them, people often lose sight of their loved ones who have stayed by them and loved them all along
• It turns out that Willy had the wrong dream all along
• Death of a Salesman is about the corruption of the American Dream
• Willy, like Biff, was born to work with his hands, but he choose a career as a salesman because he thought it will bring him success and happiness, when in fact if Willy had been a farmer or carpenter instead, he would've most likely have found success and happiness
• Willy seems to be afraid to take risks
• He did not go to Alaska with Ben
• He was scared by the new technology of the tape recorder
• He didn't ask for a promotion until Linda talked him into it
• The Lomans (Lo-Man) are not "leaders of men", as Willy would like to believe
• Biff might be right in that he is "a dime a dozen"
• Thus it is ironic when Willy says that he is not "a piece of fruit" because he is. All of his resources have been extracted by his company, so in the end, they have no more use of him and he is fired
• Happy seems doomed to follow Willy's footsteps, while Biff is not

Homework

• Read "Lecture on Stoppard"
• Death of a Salesman Annotations
• Tragedy Forum
• "Fathers" Forum
• Core Concept Notes and Outside Readings Journals

“Haiti Without Walls” by Kettly Mars | Published 1/1/11 | A Reflective Essay Analysis

           In “Haiti Without Walls”, Mars uses a pensive, hopeful, and inspirational tone in order to tell us of her experience in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake. She creates her tone with her diction, detail, syntax, and imagery. For example, Mars is pensive when she writes, "How eerie the huge cloud of dust rising...over Port-au-Prince", and she is inspirational when she writes, "we were a people lost in a tremor but united by a common fate."

           I like Mars's tone in “Haiti Without Walls” because it makes me believe once again in the human spirit, in the ability of bad times to bring out the best in people. The tone is perfect for such an essay about a person's experiences in a disaster. The essay is beautifully written and really makes one think.

           I think the tone in "Haiti Without Walls" would work perfectly for an AP essay because it is formal, written in standard English, and the author manages to reach out to the reader and really resonate with the reader, which is pretty essential in any essay, especially an AP essay.

          Through Mars’s use of rhetorical devices in “Haiti Without Walls”, she not only allows the reader to understand her essay better, but also helps it flow better. For example, Mars uses parallelism and tricolon, such as when she says, “...we have known the wrath of storms, the terrors of the cholera epidemic, the frustration of being locked in an incredible political stalemate..." to facilitate the flow of the passage and to add power to her recollection of the effects of the Haitian earthquake.

            Florey made a good diction choice with the phrase "concrete and iron" when she wrote, "...survivors pulled the wounded from concrete and iron." Although what the Mars means to say here is that the wounded were pulled out of fallen buildings, her use of "concrete and iron" (synecdoche) carry the connotation of something that is machine-made and of the industrial age, something that she wants to contrast with the completely human experience that she is describing in her essay. This clever utilization of words' connotations and synecdoche add power to the sentence. Moreover Mars uses alliteration, such as when she writes, "without walls", "telluric wave twisted", "dying day", and "dream from destruction." She also uses repetition, such as when she writes, "our country was on her knees; we were on our knees." Such use of rhetorical devices throughout her essay adds a certain spice, imagery, and flow to her essay that would not have existed otherwise.

         All in all, "Haiti Without Walls" is a enchanting and emotionally appealing essay that is neatly executed. There were no weaknesses whatsoever that I could discern in the essay.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/01/02/opinion/20110102_Op_Postcards.html?ref=opinion

"Success and Failure on the G.E.D." | Published 12/31/10 | An Editorial Analysis

        The author of "Success and Failure on the G.E.D." uses rhetorical devices to help the reader understand the argument and to help the argument flow. For example, he uses alliteration in the essay such as when he says, "innovative instructional" and "programs that prepare people", which helps the passages sound smoother, and makes the readers more receptive to what the author has to say. The author also does a really good job of taking advantage of the natural rhythm of English to get his points across. For example, he ends his sentences with phrases such as, "the way forward", and "their economic future - and the country's". By ending his sentences with something memorable, the readers walk away remembering that the G.E.D. allows people, allows America, to have a brighter future. A diction choice of the author's that really struck me is when he mentions, that "Nearly 40 million Americans are locked into dead-end jobs." I think the author's choice of "locked into" is a good diction choice here because "locked into" has connotations of confinement and being shut off from opportunities, which are situations in which no one wants to find themselves. As a result, through this diction choice, the author manages to evoke both pathos and logos in the same sentence.

           Although the author does a really good job with taking advantage of most of the rhetorical devices, I think he could’ve done more to use a wider variety of rhetorical devices in his essay, such as repetition, the rule of three, or questions.

            In this essay, the narrative persona is very formal and explanatory. The author sticks to the facts, without any embellishments, and uses statistics to describe to us the necessity of having better programs in place to help those adults who are trying to pass the G.E.D. The author creates such a tone when he writes things like, "Nearly 800,000 people take the exam each year, and about 500,000 pass" and "The test is free in some states and costs as much as $400 in others." Such parts help build up the author's voice, which is formal and informative yet impassioned. The author clearly supports one side of the issue and cares deeply for this issue, yet the author is also trying to present us with the facts and let us make our own judgment. This tone makes me like the essay more because in persuasive writing, one needs to convince an audience of something, one needs to be able to show that one cares for the issue and get others to feel the same way (pathos). One also needs to be able to back up one's claims (logos). The author pulled both off very well.

            If this essay were an AP essay, I think the voice would be appropriate because it is formal enough, but it isn't a strict and detached voice: the narrative persona is there, warm and welcoming you to see the issue as the author sees it.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/01/opinion/01sat2.html?_r=1

"To Wagner, With Love and Morbidity" by Scott Timberg | Published 12/27/10 | A Book Review Analysis

           In “To Wagner, With Love and Morbidity”, Timberg weaves together a skillful essay using many rhetorical devices to analyze The Metropolis Case by Matthew Gallaway. One of those rhetorical devices is parallelism. This is seen when he describes how The Metropolis Case is propelled by "...mix of exuberance and morbidity, fatalism and erotic energy" (Timberg). In this quote, Timberg uses four nouns to describe the novel, creating parallelism and making his essay sound better. Furthermore, Timberg uses a lot alliteration in his writing. For example, when he writes, "funny first", "things together", "wily ways", and "from feeling". Furthermore, Timberg skillfully used diction to better his writing. A specific diction choice that really struck me is when he says, "there's hardly a lazy sentence here" (Timberg). His word choice of "lazy" struck me because I've never thought of a sentence as "lazy" before and I didn't understand why he wrote "hardly a lazy sentence" instead of "all the sentences are active". But on further consideration, I realized that Timberg most likely decided to use "lazy" in this sentence because it carries with it certain connotations that brings up thoughts of dull and lifeless, which is something that Timberg wanted us to associate with certain sentences that we know of in novels, but he is telling us that such sentences do not exist in The Metropolis Case. Overall, Timberg's use of rhetorical devices in his essay makes it flow easily and helps him convey his point in an easy-to-understand manner.

          The only weakness I see in Kakutani's essay is that it tries so hard not to give away the wittiness of The Metropolis Case that it ceases to let the reader know anything about the novel's plot except that it's about three characters from different time periods who are connected by music. How does the novel start? What do the characters do? We don't know. At many times, "To Wagner, With Love and Morbidity" read more like a characters list than anything else.

            In analyzing The Metropolis Case, Timberg used Formalist criticism. In his book review, Timberg analyzed The Metropolis Case from many perspectives. He looked at characterization, rhetoric, setting, plot, and style: many of the aspects of the novel itself.

            Timberg's description of The Metropolis Case reminds me of the novel One Day. In both novels, the plot progresses in small vignettes centered around different characters. Thus, although the plot of the two books may be vastly different. The style in which the two stories are told are very similar.
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/28/books/28book.html?ref=bookreviews